tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34425107.post5051851526608051432..comments2008-10-09T20:29:03.112-04:00Fantasy Football Librarianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10710042496167760096noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34425107.post-12296001096431511542008-10-09T20:29:03.112-04:002008-10-09T20:29:03.112-04:00Hi Andy,<BR/>I do like Nate Jackson a little more than Graham - I have virtually nothing to back this up other than gut though. Jackson is filling in for Scheffler so I think he's capable of being a decent fill-in while Scheff is out. Graham has been playing all along and I'm not convinced his work will change very much with Jackson in instead of Scheff. Hope that helps.Fantasy Football Librarianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08698130238500266869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34425107.post-1872640503956727322008-10-08T11:26:36.820-04:002008-10-08T11:26:36.820-04:00What's the skinny with Nate Jackson? He was ahead of TS at one point in the preseason via the Denver TE rotation. <BR/><BR/>Rotoworld was talking about how the coaching staff was excited to get him involved.<BR/><BR/>Potentially more valuable than Daniel Graham in the short term?Andynoreply@blogger.com