The results are in! Take a look my article on The Fifth Down to read up on the top 15 fantasy football experts for overall accuracy with their preseason rankings for the 2010 season - as well as the top 10 sites at each position. I'll be back later today or tomorrow with some more thoughts on this contest, but here's an alphabetical list of all 50 participants. If you were part of the contest and want to know how you did or which players really helped or hurt you, just shoot me an e-mail.
Congrats to the Bruno Boys!
Accuracy analysis participants:
4 For 4
Accuscore
Ask the Commish
The Big Lead
Bruno Boys
CBSSports.com (both Dave Richard & Jamey Eisenberg)
Draft Analyzer
Draft Sharks
ESPN
FantasyFootball.com
Fantasy Football Geek Blog
Fantasy Football Maniaxs
Fantasy Football Sherpa
Fantasy Football Toolbox
Fantasy Football Trader
Fantasy Football Xtreme
Fantasy Insights
Fantasy Mojo
Fantasy Nation
FantasySharks.com
Fantazzle
Fantistics
FFCalculator (ADP)
FFToday.com
Football Diehards
Footballguys
Football Outsiders
FOX Sports
Hatty Waiver Wire Guru
The Hazean
The Huddle
Junkyard Jake
KFFL
Lester’s Legends
The Mac Bros
Pigskin Addiction
Pro Football Focus
ProFootballWeekly.com
Pyromaniac.com
RapidDraft
RealTime Fantasy Sports
Rotocommunity
Rotopicks
RotoPilot
RotoProfessor
Rotoworld
Sports Illustrated
WhatIfSports
Yahoo!
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
2010 Fantasy Football Accuracy Rankings Contest!
Posted by Fantasy Football Librarian at Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Labels: accuracy analysis
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
any way that we could get this "in season"? By week 5 we would get a pretty good idea to who knows their stuff.
Who was the most accurate of the last few years? Did Yahoo win last year? Thank you for all of the great work.
I think your conclusion (that experts are not significantly different in predicitve ability) is off. Certainly, the way you choose to measure performance is going to introduce more randomness than a more rigorous approach. I.e., fantasypros.com has shown how to measure experts in such a way that is at least somewhat predictive week-to-week and year-to-year. I don't mean to diminish the effort you put into this study, but I feel your commentary is misleading, and also ignores the far superior work that has been done by others.
Post a Comment