Skip to main content

2015 Streaming Defenses: Week 3

Hi all and welcome to your third week of advice from FFLibrarian writer, Bob, who always brings his streaming defense genius our way. Enjoy and good luck!

Wow! What a week for surprises, disappointments, and clarity. Did anyone see the Jaguars beating Miami? There went a lot of survival pools. Romo going down? That’s got to fry FFLibrarian writer Jen Ryan, the ultimate Cowboys fan. But there was some clarity on the Defensive side of things. The Jets are even better than advertised, and the Broncos could be the revival of the Orange Crush. Speaking of crush, our top defenses really dropped a doogie. And the streams weren’t that much better.

Below are the results of week 2 using MFL stats and Fantasy Sharks scoring. Suggested streams are outlined in Blue. Owned and started are in Green for start, Yellow for temper expectations, and Red for look elsewhere. Our streams did decidedly better than the widely owned teams, but it was a shallow victory. The real winners were the teams that weren’t highly owned OR suggested streams.  

Rank
Team
Points
1
Broncos
24
2
Browns
23
3
Cardinals
22
4
Cowboys
20
5
Jets
16
6
Patriots
16
7
Buccaneers
14
8
Chiefs
14
9
Bengals
13
11
Eagles
10
12
Packers
10
13
Saints
9
15
Panthers
8
17
Texans
8
22
Rams
7
23
Bills
6
25
Lions
5
26
Seahawks
5
30
Dolphins
3
31
Ravens
3
  
So what did we learn? As far as targets it got muddier this week as well. The Jags made Mia Def look really bad, so they go down to ‘watch’ status. The Browns proved that the Titans are back on the list of targets. WAS also showed some consistency and found a game plan to confound the feared Rams front seven. Was goes to ‘watch list’.

Did other targets emerge? Boy, did they!!! But our new targets have one thing in common: wounded or battered QBs. With Romo down and a running game that has disappointed, his replacement will see a lot of pressure. Dal definitely goes on the watch list. And could things go anymore wrong for the Bears? Cutler is going to miss some time and Clausen is going to be running for his life. Chi goes straight to my target list. Brees will probably play, but is hurt, and the New Orleans offensive line is the cause of his malady. They lost to TB…they go straight to my target list. Stafford is hurt, and will underperform if he starts, Det goes on the ‘watch’ list.

With those observations in mind what does Week 2 look like? Here are some links to early streaming advice. They may or may not align with my analysis below.

Here are the ownership numbers and projections for Defs this week of the ‘owned’ defenses. Owned being better than 80%.


So I like five of the highly owned this week, but here are some juicy streams that could outperform even those. 



I love the Broncos and Jets this week, but many are citing the Browns and Bengals, who will win out? We’ll see next week. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thoughts on the Falcons v Cowboys or Vikings v Chargers?
Unknown said…
Although the Cowboys defense is gaining, not against the Falcons. The Falcons will destroy Dallas today. Min is a decent start against the Chargers.

Popular posts from this blog

Labor Day FF links

Happy long weekend! Here's hoping most of you are free to enjoy the 3-day weekend and the relaxation and fun that comes with it. I spent my Sunday participating in 3 fantasy football drafts scattered throughout the day and night, but I think I've finally wrapped up my drafts for the year. So like many of you I'm now turning my attention to the Week 1 games! But before we get to some player rankings and prep for Week 1, I want to make sure that all you experts out there are aware of the upcoming deadline for the annual accuracy contest that I run with the Fantasy Sports Trade Association. I compare preseason positional rankings from experts to the final outcome of the fantasy season to see which site had the most accurate preseason rankings, and this year's deadline is fast approaching: September 9th by kickoff. Check out the info on the FSTA site for more details and be sure to e-mail me your submissions. Now, onto Week 1! First up, let's get to some of this

2010 Week 2 consensus start/sit

Greetings and happy weekend. I've got this week's consensus start/sit for you which is a tally of all the start/sit votes that players received in the various start/sit articles that I linked to earlier in the week. So while these aren't my personal recommendations, I do think knowing what the consensus is could be of help when making lineup decisions...so enjoy! Note: the players are listed in no particular order. QB Start: Michael Vick, Kyle Orton, Matt Ryan, Jason Campbell Sit: David Garrard, Alex Smith, Jay Cutler, Vince Young, Carson Palmer RB Start: LeSean McCoy, Darren McFadden, Ahmad Bradshaw, Brandon Jackson Sit: Tim Hightower, C.J. Spiller, Beanie Wells, Ronnie Brown WR Start: Santana Moss, Legedu Naanee, Malcolm Floyd, Mike Williams (TB), Dez Bryant Sit: Randy Moss, Michael Crabtree TE Start: Chris Cooley, Todd Heap, John Carlson, Jermichael Finley Sit: Jermaine Gresham, Owen Daniels, Tony Scheffler, Jeremy Shockey, Bo Scaife Kicker Start: La

A hiatus

Update:  It is with a very heavy heart that I tell you all that yesterday, August 30th, I delivered our stillborn daughter, Caroline Mary. This has been an almost surreal and definitely heartbreaking experience and I appreciate the support in each and every one of your notes. Caroline will be honored and loved always. Thank you, thank you, thank you for your thoughts and prayers - they mean the world to our family. I have been a very poor blogger this month and feel I owe you all an explanation, particularly as this is crunch time for draft prep. I hope this is not too personal of a look into my life since I know most of you are just here for the football. I am nearly 18 weeks pregnant and we have learned that our baby (a little girl!) has triploidy, a chromosomal abnormality that means she has three copies of every chromosome instead of the normal two. The doctors have explained that it's a completely random occurrence and fairly rare that she has made it this far along, but tha