Skip to main content

2009 Week 1 projections (already!) and more

T minus 7 until some burly dudes come to ferry off the majority of our possessions to New York City. While I'm sitting here thinking about just how many freaking mugs we somehow own and how one could possibly drink enough coffee to rationalize this level of mug acquisition (and inevitably, how to pack them all...), you all are probably thinking more along the fantasy football lines. Have no fear! My mind is always on football to some extent...so check out today's links:
  • We've all heard the phrase Running Back By Committee (RBBC) but FFToolbox takes this committee idea to a different level - how should you draft to create fantasy pairs that might be nearly as effective as a top level player? They've taken a look at both Quarterback by Committee and Tight End by Committee.
  • How much of a benefit will Cutler bring to Chicago? See the Fifth Down's How Many Wins is Cutler Worth?
  • Hatty Waiver Wire Guru has a list of Underrated RBs You Need to Remember, including one of my personal faves, Derrick Ward. Though interestingly enough Sports Data Hub has an article that reminds me to temper my expectations with Ward this year - see Is Derrick Ward this year's Michael Turner? for the details.
  • Peter King is back with some pre-training camp thoughts and news in this week's MMQB. Oh man, I love reading "the 28-week marathon to the Super Bowl is on" - it's here, baby! Football season - finally!
  • Another installment of Football Outsiders' Wisdom of the Crowds - wrapping up the WRs this time with guys like Fitz, Cotchery, Welker and Heyward-Bey.
  • I think FFXtreme had the first start/sit list up and now they're numero uno with Week 1 Projections, too. Love it. Thanks FFXtreme for feeding into my fantasy football addiction...
Finally, if you're part of the FFLibrarian League please remember to check out the league message board from time to time for the latest news. Our draft (which will be conducted on MyFantasyLeague.com with e-mail notifications) will start on August 24th at 9AM eastern and will conclude before the season starts!

Comments

Unknown said…
Every year I think about implementing quarterback by committee, but the limiting factor is bench slots. With most league configurations, I am better off stocking RB/WR depth than keeping two mediocre QBs.

This strategy also works better as an in-season management tool, since it all hinges on strength of schedule. It's historically difficult to know how good a defense will be until Week 3 or 4. Preseason SoS ratings are usually garbage. Plus, every year there is a Chad Pennington or Tyler Thigpen chilling on the waiver wire until midseason. So drafting two scrub QBs is not worth it.

Drafting two TEs should always elicit derision and mockery.
Anonymous said…
"Drafting two TEs should always elicit derision and mockery."

Even in a 16-team league with 8 bench spots and only 2 WRs to start?

I'm thinking at least 60 RBs and 60 WRs will be gone by the end of the draft, and after getting a DEF or two, a K and a TE, you've got 3-4 spots left on the bench. All RB-WR depth? At some point I'd rather take a shot at a TE2 than someone like Aundrae Allison or Justin Forsett.
Unknown said…
Lol, I suppose you got me with that configuration, Anonymous. A 16-team league with 8 bench slots will definitely draft a lot of randoms. But I still think you'd be drafting more for breakout potential there, rather than for a TEBBC. TE strength of schedule is even less reliable/harder to calculate than QB SoS.
Peter said…
I do agree that the strength-of-schedule arguments have to be taken with a fairly large grain of salt, but some seem more reliable than others. It's tough to start RBs again Minnesota, for example. I don't like QBs WRs or TEs against terrible defenses either (so long as the team hasn't the firepower to keep things close with a shootout), but you never know. Studs have a good chance to produce no matter who the matchup is.

If I draft a QB or TE committee, it won't be because their schedules mesh nicely but because I missed out on the elites and want to grab two borderline starters in hopes that one will catch on.

Am I confident Zach Miller (OAK) and Dustin Keller will produce good numbers this year? No, but if I get both, then there's a fair chance ONE of them will.
Anonymous said…
En el caso de Cutler, me pregunto si es mas importante su brazo o su habilidad para guiar un equipo. Todas esas estadisticas de "fifth down" de los ultimos dias son simplemente "misleading" y prueban como uno puede usar los numeros para probar ambas ideas...o en terminos estadisticos no son "significantes". Al final en mi opinion uno deberia computar la "O-line", que es basica para el exito de un QB
Unknown said…
Round 16, I've already drafted Dallas Clark, and Kellen Winslow's still on the board in an 8-man league. Not a chance in hell I'm passing him up.

Popular posts from this blog

Labor Day FF links

Happy long weekend! Here's hoping most of you are free to enjoy the 3-day weekend and the relaxation and fun that comes with it. I spent my Sunday participating in 3 fantasy football drafts scattered throughout the day and night, but I think I've finally wrapped up my drafts for the year. So like many of you I'm now turning my attention to the Week 1 games! But before we get to some player rankings and prep for Week 1, I want to make sure that all you experts out there are aware of the upcoming deadline for the annual accuracy contest that I run with the Fantasy Sports Trade Association. I compare preseason positional rankings from experts to the final outcome of the fantasy season to see which site had the most accurate preseason rankings, and this year's deadline is fast approaching: September 9th by kickoff. Check out the info on the FSTA site for more details and be sure to e-mail me your submissions. Now, onto Week 1! First up, let's get to some of this

2010 Week 2 consensus start/sit

Greetings and happy weekend. I've got this week's consensus start/sit for you which is a tally of all the start/sit votes that players received in the various start/sit articles that I linked to earlier in the week. So while these aren't my personal recommendations, I do think knowing what the consensus is could be of help when making lineup decisions...so enjoy! Note: the players are listed in no particular order. QB Start: Michael Vick, Kyle Orton, Matt Ryan, Jason Campbell Sit: David Garrard, Alex Smith, Jay Cutler, Vince Young, Carson Palmer RB Start: LeSean McCoy, Darren McFadden, Ahmad Bradshaw, Brandon Jackson Sit: Tim Hightower, C.J. Spiller, Beanie Wells, Ronnie Brown WR Start: Santana Moss, Legedu Naanee, Malcolm Floyd, Mike Williams (TB), Dez Bryant Sit: Randy Moss, Michael Crabtree TE Start: Chris Cooley, Todd Heap, John Carlson, Jermichael Finley Sit: Jermaine Gresham, Owen Daniels, Tony Scheffler, Jeremy Shockey, Bo Scaife Kicker Start: La

Start/Sit Week 4 and a smattering of rankings

It's been awhile, my fantasy football friends. I have lofty intentions of getting several posts up here each week, but life is busy and I will do my best. So in the intervening 6 years since I've posted regularly on here, our family added another child (now there are 3!), moved back to Boulder for a sabbatical year and then returned to Knoxville, and we have basically been chugging along like many of the rest of you. My two boys (who turn 12 and 9 soon) are in a fantasy football league for the first time this year with their buddies, which ostensibly is the just the dads (and mom!) playing one another of course. But my oldest is taking it super seriously and what kind of Fantasy Football Librarian would I be if I didn't step up my game for him? So I'm back - and am interested in the fantasy landscape - lots of the same awesome sites out there, but many new ones as well. I'll try to incorporate a mix. Please be sure to let me know if my 2006 ways aren't working i